Losing it in MacDonald’s Fw: scratching the itch

When I read the forwarded piece below.  It moved me to want to share it.  Something about it struck a nerve.  My next task was: who would be interested in this?  I wanted to share it with the group I host on Monday nights.  That group looks at happiness and fulfillment and what leads to those desirable states.  I am sending it to them.  But I want to share it more widely because it moved me so much.

Funny how that works.  When something moves me I want to share it.  Is everyone like that?  I think so.  We all want connection.  And what better to connect with than something that moves us.

But why do we see so much negative stuff in the paper?  (You’ll see the piece is about a horrible loss of control by a woman in a MacDonalds Restaurant).  One reason is that people read that stuff.  We now know from research that humans are much more sensitive to danger than happy situations.  In fact, we are wired for danger.  In other words we are much more sensitive to negative stimuli than to positive ones.  This was a survival strategy in the past when we had to look out for sabre toothed tigers.  Now it may not be so helpful.

So I send this to you to consider whether you focus on the negative in your life more than the positive and how you feel about that.  I also invite you to consider what else that poor woman who lost it might have been dealing with to make her react so violently.

Much Love

Bruce Rosove,  (613) 233 8013

Life Coach, Consultant,

The Emotional Fitness Institute Ottawa


I affirm the CHARTER FOR COMPASSION http://charterforcompassion.org/

From: Bob Koehler

Sent: Wednesday, January 13, 2010 1:17 PM

Subject: scratching the itch


For release 1/14/10


By Robert C. Koehler

Tribune Media Services

The whole point of so much of what we do seems to be to weed people out. We do it for fun, and without awareness.

The following miniature news item, accompanied by a voyeuristic surveillance camera photo, ran as filler in Redeye, the Chicago Tribune adjunct publication for the too-busy-to-read crowd:

“Police in Kansas City, Mo., are looking for a woman who went on a rampage at a McDonald’s because she didn’t like her hamburger, The Associated Press reports. Police say the woman caused thousands of dollars in damage Dec. 27 when she became upset that the restaurant wouldn’t refund her money.

“Employees had offered to replace her hamburger, but the woman refused and demanded her money back.

“Police released a video showing the woman throwing a sign and a bucket of water over the counter and pushing off a glass display case and three open cash registers. She then cursed and fled.”

The point of this story, headlined “She’s Got a Serious Beef,” was entertainment. Very slight entertainment, to be sure — half a snicker’s worth, maybe. “Police are looking for her.” Hah!

The reason I pause at this sad little shred of news, this slice of unhappy trouble on a poppy-seed bun, is because something here feels enormous: This is the flotsam of a life coming undone, but the context in which it is displayed as “news” is solely for the sport of watching someone screw up, and it makes me want to administer a Zen slap or something across the face of my profession. Stop it! Stop purveying disconnection as news.

To put it another way, responsible journalism involves more than scratching the itch.

“The principle of wholeness thus requires looking for, and responding to, complex interconnections, not single acts of separate individuals. Anything short of that is seen as a naïve response destined to ultimate failure.”

Since newspapers are so desperate to reinvent themselves, what if they tried being part of the solution instead of part of the problem? Our disconnected culture is running out of options. Forget our berserk, privatized foreign policy (robot planes, a mercenary army, a war without end); we’re unraveling on the home front. We have the world’s largest prison population, by an enormous margin. We’re down to our constitutional right to live in fear, and to fire back. As a culture, we’re as lost as the woman in Kansas City who didn’t like her hamburger. To laugh at her is to laugh bitterly at our own spiritual void.

Perhaps, if we are to save ourselves — and in the process, avoid destroying the world — we need to start listening to the voices we have historically tried to silence and to start taking seriously the cultural worldviews we almost destroyed.

This is the conclusion that has been growing on me, at any rate, since I read the book quoted above, Returning to the Teachings, by Canadian Crown Attorney Rupert Ross. This 1996 book, by a legal professional whose job included prosecuting crimes in tiny Aboriginal communities across northern Canada (a woman going crazy at a fast-food restaurant could easily have been such a crime), explores the growing movement in these devastated communities to disentangle themselves from the Western “justice” system that has been imposed on them and to reclaim, and heal, their lives.

The absolutely shocking thing about Ross’ book is how it spills beyond Aboriginal culture into our own. It’s more than just a happy account of tribal cultures rediscovering ancient traditions. As the book examines the failure of adversarial, punishment-focused justice in tiny Northern Canada communities, readers cannot help but think about its failure everywhere.

The more I read, the more convinced I became that our approach to life — in essence, to dominate it rather than understand it holistically — is the “primitive” one, and the time has come to stop acting like clueless captains of our own fate and to start seeking wisdom: to start exploring the ways in which all of life is connected.

As Ross points out, one of the key differences between Aboriginal and Western justice is in the focus. While we obsess over single criminal actions, the facts of which are examined in detail at costly, adversarial trials, at the end of which judgment is pronounced — and nothing changes in regard to root causes — the Aboriginal community focuses instead on the relationships damaged in the wrongdoing and sees the healing of those relationships as the top priority.

I know I’m not alone in believing that the place to start our renewal is to focus on healing. Once we commit to this and begin seeing ourselves, just as Aboriginal children learn to do, as “participants in webs of complex interdependencies,” everything will change — including what we tolerate as news.

Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and nationally syndicated writer. You can respond to this column at koehlercw@gmail.com or visit his Web site at commonwonders.com.)

© 2010 Tribune Media Services, Inc.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s